Marshallian Demand

Ordinary (uncompensated) demand: the utility-maximizing bundle as a function of prices and income.

Marshallian demand (also called ordinary demand or uncompensated demand) is the quantity of each good a consumer chooses when they maximize utility subject to a budget constraint, given prices and income.

Setup: utility maximization

Let (x) be a vector of quantities, (p) a vector of prices, and (m) income. The consumer’s problem is:

[ \max_{x \ge 0} u(x) \quad \text{s.t.} \quad p \cdot x \le m. ]

The solution (x(p,m)) is the Marshallian demand function: it tells you the chosen bundle at prices (p) and income (m).

Key properties (what economists use)

In standard consumer theory (with locally nonsatiated preferences), Marshallian demand has several useful properties:

  • Adding-up (budget exhaustion): typically (p \cdot x(p,m) = m).
  • Homogeneity of degree 0: (x(\lambda p, \lambda m) = x(p,m)) for any (\lambda > 0). Only relative prices and real income matter.
  • Elasticities: price and income elasticities are computed directly from (x(p,m)) and are central for demand estimation and policy analysis.

Marshallian vs Hicksian demand (and the Slutsky equation)

Marshallian demand mixes two effects of a price change:

  • Substitution effect: holding utility constant, how the consumer substitutes toward relatively cheaper goods.
  • Income effect: the change in purchasing power caused by the price change.

The Hicksian (compensated) demand (h(p,u)) is defined by expenditure minimization at a target utility level (u):

[ \min_{x \ge 0} p \cdot x \quad \text{s.t.} \quad u(x) \ge u. ]

The Slutsky equation links Marshallian and Hicksian responses. In one common form:

[ \frac{\partial x_i(p,m)}{\partial p_j}

\frac{\partial h_i(p,u)}{\partial p_j} -; x_j(p,m),\frac{\partial x_i(p,m)}{\partial m}. ]

The first term is the (compensated) substitution effect; the second term is the income effect.

Worked example (Cobb-Douglas)

If preferences are (u(x_1,x_2)=x_1^{\alpha}x_2^{1-\alpha}) with (0<\alpha<1), then Marshallian demand is:

[ x_1(p,m)=\frac{\alpha m}{p_1}, \qquad x_2(p,m)=\frac{(1-\alpha)m}{p_2}. ]

This makes the “income and price” dependence transparent: doubling income doubles demanded quantities, while a higher own-price reduces quantity inversely.

Practical interpretation

Marshallian demand is what you typically estimate from observed choices, because real consumers face actual budgets and actual incomes. It is the core object behind:

  • demand curves and elasticities,
  • tax and subsidy incidence analysis,
  • welfare comparisons (often alongside compensated objects like the expenditure function).

Knowledge Check

### In this article, what is Marshallian demand? - [x] The utility-maximizing bundle \(x(p,m)\) given prices and income - [ ] The cost-minimizing bundle given prices and a target output - [ ] Demand that holds utility fixed when prices change - [ ] Demand that ignores the budget constraint > **Explanation:** Marshallian (ordinary/uncompensated) demand is defined as the solution to the utility-maximization problem subject to the budget constraint. ### If all prices and income double, what does Marshallian demand predict (under standard assumptions)? - [x] The chosen bundle is unchanged: \(x(\lambda p,\lambda m)=x(p,m)\) - [ ] The chosen bundle doubles for every good - [ ] The chosen bundle halves for every good - [ ] There is not enough information to say anything > **Explanation:** Marshallian demand is homogeneous of degree 0 in \((p,m)\), so only relative prices and real income matter. ### In the Slutsky equation, what does the first term \(\partial h_i/\partial p_j\) represent? - [x] The substitution effect (holding utility constant) - [ ] The income effect (holding prices constant) - [ ] The effect of advertising on demand - [ ] The effect of income on demand > **Explanation:** Hicksian demand holds utility fixed, so its price derivative isolates the compensated substitution response. ### In the Slutsky equation, what does the second term \(-x_j\,\partial x_i/\partial m\) capture? - [x] The income effect from the change in purchasing power caused by the price change - [ ] A pure substitution response with utility fixed - [ ] A change in preferences (tastes) - [ ] A change in the production technology > **Explanation:** A higher price reduces real purchasing power; the income-response \(\partial x_i/\partial m\) translates that into a quantity change.