New Protectionism

The revival of protectionism with new strategic and economic arguments aimed at enhancing competitive advantage

Background

New protectionism refers to the modern incarnation of protectionism, underpinned by novel arguments and economic theories. Traditional protectionism, characterized by tariffs, quotas, and subsidies to domestic industries, aims to protect local businesses from foreign competition. New protectionism revives these measures, incorporating contemporary strategic considerations and economic assumptions.

Historical Context

Protectionism has historically ebbed and flowed in response to economic conditions and political ideologies. Following World War II, there was a significant push towards free trade, resulting in the formation of organizations such as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and, later, the World Trade Organization (WTO).

However, economic challenges and shifts, such as those seen in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, have led to a resurgence of protectionist sentiment—what we now term “new protectionism.” This resurgence is justified by newer, nuanced arguments beyond traditional anti-dumping or safeguarding measures.

Definitions and Concepts

New protectionism encompasses the revival of protectionist policies with updated justifications involving strategic considerations and increasing returns to scale.

  • Strategic Protectionism: Involves protecting certain domestic industries to deter foreigners from entering the market competitively.
  • Increasing Returns to Scale: Refers to the economic principle where the output of a production process increases disproportionately as the scale of production is scaled up, leading to decreased average costs and enhanced competitive positioning.

Major Analytical Frameworks

Classical Economics

Classical economics, pioneered by Adam Smith and David Ricardo, typically advocates for free trade. They argue that protectionism leads to inefficiencies and divert resources away from the most productive uses.

Neoclassical Economics

Neoclassical economists also generally favor free trade but recognize some justifications for protectionism in cases such as market failures or strategic industries critical to national security.

Keynesian Economic

Keynesian economists might support protectionism during economic downturns to support domestic employment and industry, though they caution against long-term reliance.

Marxian Economics

Marxian economics views protectionism through the lens of class struggle and might support it as a means for newly industrializing nations to develop locally-controlled economies.

Institutional Economics

Institutional economists focus on how trade policies, including protectionism, are affected by legal, political, and social institutions and how these policies shape economic outcomes.

Behavioral Economics

Behavioral economists examine the cognitive biases and social behaviors influencing trade policies, noting that voter sentiments and political pressures often shape the new protectionist policies.

Post-Keynesian Economics

Post-Keynesians might support strategic elements of new protectionism to safeguard industries crucial for economic stability and development.

Austrian Economics

Austrian economists typically oppose protectionism, emphasizing free-market competition and the long-term benefits of open trade.

Development Economics

Development economists see new protectionism as potentially beneficial for developing countries looking to build and protect nascent industries from prematurely facing international competition.

Monetarism

Monetarists are generally critical of protectionism, stressing the importance of controlling inflation and maintaining open markets for international trade efficiency.

Comparative Analysis

In contrasting new protectionism with its traditional counterpart, it is evident that modern arguments—rooted in strategic advantages and the theory of increasing returns—provide a sophisticated rationale compared to merely safeguarding local jobs. Contemporary discourse also more prominently acknowledges the potential global fallout violating cooperative norms that allow all countries mutual benefit from abstaining from protectionist policies.

Case Studies

  • United States: Imposing tariffs on steel and aluminum from 2018 aimed at revitalizing domestic production yet resulting in international trade tensions.
  • European Union: Agricultural subsidies serve as a protectionist measure under reform presentations gardening Europe’s economic vs. social interests.

Suggested Books for Further Studies

  • “Free Trade under Fire” by Douglas A. Irwin
  • “The Great Transformation” by Karl Polanyi
  • “Strategic Trade Policy and Global Competition” edited by Paul R. Krugman
  • Protectionism: Economic policies restricting imports to protect domestic industries through tariffs, quotas, and subsidies.
  • Tariff: A tax imposed on imported goods to make them more expensive relative to domestic products.
  • Trade War: A situation in which countries impose tariffs or other restrictions on goods from another nation, causing a rise in retaliatory tactics.
  • Beggar-my-Neighbour Policy: Economic policies designed to improve one country’s circumstances at the expense of others.

Quiz

### The main difference between classical and new protectionism is: - [ ] Focus on agricultural sectors - [x] Use of modern strategic arguments - [ ] Complete trade bans - [ ] Focus on consumer goods > **Explanation**: New protectionism incorporates strategic arguments based on economic theories like increasing returns to scale, differing from classical protectionism's sectoral focus. ### Which policy can be described as "beggar-thy-neighbour"? - [x] New protectionism - [ ] Subsidy to Domestic R&D - [ ] Free trade agreement - [ ] Currency swap agreement > **Explanation**: New protectionism is a policy aiming to benefit the domestic economy at the expense of foreign economies, typical of beggar-thy-neighbour policies. ### Which economic body primarily discourages protectionist measures? - [ ] UN - [ ] NATO - [x] WTO - [ ] OPEC > **Explanation**: The World Trade Organization (WTO) focuses on promoting free trade and reducing protectionist practices globally. ### True or False: New protectionism only benefits the domestic industries and has no international consequences. - [ ] True - [x] False > **Explanation**: New protectionism can trigger trade wars and have significant negative international economic impacts. ### What was a significant protectionist measure in the 1930s? - [x] The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act - [ ] Marshall Plan - [ ] NAFTA - [ ] New Deal > **Explanation**: The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of the 1930s raised tariffs, a significant measure of protectionism during the Great Depression. ### The strategic argument for new protectionism involves: - [ ] Decreasing public debt - [x] Deterring foreign competition - [ ] Reducing taxes - [ ] Improving education systems > **Explanation**: Strategic arguments posit that protecting domestic industries can delay or prevent foreign competition from entering the market. ### New protectionism often links to which market condition? - [x] Imperfect competition - [ ] Perfect competition - [ ] Monopsony - [ ] Duopoly > **Explanation**: Imperfect competition, where producers with economies of scale can lower costs, links closely to the efficacy of new protectionism strategies. ### Which of these can be an effect of new protectionism? - [ ] Decrease in domestic production - [x] Increase in average costs for rivals - [ ] Reduced tax revenue - [ ] Improved international relations > **Explanation**: Protectionism can increase the average costs for foreign rivals, reducing their ability to compete. ### Which famous economist is known for criticizing protectionism? - [x] Frédéric Bastiat - [ ] Karl Marx - [ ] Alfred Marshall - [ ] John Maynard Keynes > **Explanation**: Frédéric Bastiat is well-known for advocating rudimentary economic principles supporting free trade over protectionism. ### New protectionism can lead to ___ at international levels. - [ ] Enhanced cooperation - [x] Trade wars - [ ] Increased joint ventures - [ ] Technological collaborations > **Explanation**: Protective measures often lead to retaliatory policies and trade wars.